Answer:
Human rights also guarantee people the means necessary to satisfy their basic needs, such as food, housing, and education, so they can take full advantage of all opportunities. Finally, by guaranteeing life, liberty, equality, and security, human rights protect people against abuse by those who are more powerful.
State the difference between primary source and secondary source
Answer:
Primary sources can be described as those sources that are closest to the origin of the information. ...Secondary sources often use generalizations, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, articles, and reference books.
Merchants turned to bankers to help finance their ventures true or fale
Identify the word or phrase that correctly completes each sentence.
In which region did most colonists live in towns and cities?
Answer: New England Colonies
Explanation:
your welcome
Answer:
New england colonies got it right
Explanation:
anding
Introduction: Match each word on the left with the correct description on the right.
Alexandria
made up of things that are very different
from each other
Hellenistic
center of trade and civilization following
the conquest of Alexander
diverse
to steal, usually by using strong force
plunder
to bring together in one place for a
common purpose
assemble
relating to Greek culture following the
reign of Alexander the Great
Intro
Answer: assemble- to bring together in one place for a common purpose.
Alexandria - center of trade and civilization following to conquest of Alexander.
Hellenistic- relating to Greek culture following the reign of Alexander of the great
Plunder - to steal , usually by using strong force.
Diverse - made up of things that are very different from each other.
Explanation: it’s right , trust me.
Assemble- to bring together in one place for a common purpose.
Alexandria - the center of trade and civilization following to conquest of Alexander.
Hellenistic- relating to Greek culture following the reign of Alexander of the great
Plunder - to steal, usually by using strong force.
Diverse - made up of things that are very different from each other.
Why is Alexandria so famous?Alexandria changed into great acknowledged for the Lighthouse of Alexandria (Pharos), one of the Seven Wonders of the historical international; its first-rate Library, the largest within the historic global; and the Necropolis, one of the Seven Wonders of the center a long time.
What is the Hellenistic lifestyle?Hellenization, or Hellenism, refers to the unfolding of Greek culture that had all started after the conquest of Alexander the excellent in the fourth century, B.C.E. One must think of the improvement of the Japanese Mediterranean, sincerely, on two primary levels.
Learn more about Alexandria here: brainly.com/question/14377636
#SPJ2
What species in order appeared first on earth
Answer:
hi
Explanation:
Why did philosophies such a legalism AND Confucianism develop in China?
A. To encourage rebellions and divide China,
B. So that China could spread their ideas to the rest of Asia.
C. To organize the chaotic society that existed after the Zhou Dynasty.
D. Since China did not have a Priest class, they needed someone to tell them what
to believe.
Answer:b
Explanation:
Jxnsmkkcicjcjdnsn
Which was a challenge for the earliest permanent settlements?
O Flooding allowed villagers to expand their property
O Fire risk increased due to the closeness of buildings.
O Disease was a threat because of the close proximity to the rivers.
O Droughts were a challenge that villagers overcame with technology.
Answer:
B Fire risk increased due to the closeness of buildings.
Explanation:
Answer:
b
Explanation:
I just finished the test
what is corroboration
Answer:
evidence which confirms or supports a statement
What is the difference between checks and balances and separation of powers and why are they important? Who came up with these concepts?
Explanation:
The system of checks and balances in government was developed to ensure that no one branch of government would become too powerful. The framers of the U.S. Constitution built a system that divides power between the three branches of the U.S. government—legislative, executive and judicial—and includes various limits and controls on the powers of each branch.
What is the difference between Humanism and
Feudalism?
Answer:What is Humanism?
Humanism can be defined as a system of thought believing that people can live their lives without the need for religious beliefs. However, there are others who consider humanism as proving a significant position to the human being, human values, etc. There are many branches of Humanism. They are Renaissance Humanism, Modern Humanism, Secular Humanism, Philosophical Humanism, Religious Humanism, etc. Humanism place great significance on the role of science and also the reason.
According to humanists, belief should be placed on those that can be considered as rational and scientific. Beyond the realms of this reason and science, one cannot find truth. They are mostly atheists and tend to either deny the existence of God or else have no belief in supernatural existences. However, Humanists believe in the necessity of morality. The sense of right and wrong in actions are not justified by the usage of religion but science and reason. Since humanists do not believe in the existence of the supernatural, they also deny rebirth or the ideas of heaven and hell.
WHAT IS FEUDALISM
Feudalism is an economic, social, legal, and political relationship that prevailed in medieval Europe. As such feudalism is synonymous with the social structure that existed in medieval Europe. Feudalism is also considered as the first step towards establishment of monarchies. A feudal society was a military hierarchy where lords, who owned huge tracts of land offered fiefs or units of land to the mounted fighters, who were termed as vassals, in exchange of military service. Various factors like financial worth of the lord, quality of land, ability of the vassals influenced the terms of agreement between the lord and the vassals. In the later part of the medieval history the vassals were allowed to pay cash in lieu of military service. The agreement between the lord and the vassals would terminate with the demise of the concerned lord, but rights and duties of vassals would bestow upon their successors.
Humanism can be characterized as an arrangement of naturally suspected accepting that individuals can carry on with their lives without the requirement for strict convictions and Feudalism is a financial, social, lawful, and political relationship that won in archaic Europe.
What is the difference between Humanism and Feudalism?Nonetheless, there are other people who consider humanism as demonstrating a critical situation to the individual, human qualities, and so forth. There are many parts of Humanism.
As indicated by humanists, conviction ought to be put on those that can be viewed as objective and logical. Past the domains of this explanation and science, one can't track down truth. They are for the most part agnostics and will generally either deny the presence of God or, more than likely have no faith in otherworldly presences.
As such feudalism is inseparable from the social construction that existed in middle age Europe. Feudalism is additionally viewed as the most important move towards foundation of governments. A medieval society was a tactical progressive system where masters, who possessed immense lots of land offered fiefs or units of land to the mounted contenders, who were named as vassals, in return of military help.
Therefore on the other hand applied to different Western convictions, strategies, and ways of thinking that put focal accentuation on the human domain.
Learn more about feudalism here:
brainly.com/question/11276385
#SPJ2
Is Donald Trump doing a good job with the Corona Virus? If not what should he have done better. Give a reason why
Answer:
This is a opinion based question. However, no he isn't.
Explanation:
Compared to everywhere else in the world our Corona cases has gone up. Other countries are taking this situation much more safer. They are wearing masks and taking more precaution than us. He is doing the opposite. Hope this helped
Why did Francisco Vázquez de Coronado believe that his expedition to Quivira had failed?
A. He could not achieve friendly relations with the natives.
B. He did not find vast amounts of gold.
C. He was unable to conquer the native people.
D. He never found the city of Quivira.
Answer:
answer is b
Explanation:
Answer: the answer is b
Explanation: I got it correct
What class of citizens were responsible for
building the pyramids in ancient Egypt?
Answer:
Slaves, Farmers, Peasants :))
Explanation:
When did Mesopotamian cities begin forming and what does the name of this civilization mean?
The Mesopotamian cities began forming around 4000 BCE and the name of the civilization 'Sumerian civilization' means "land of the civilized kings".
When did Mesopotamian form and what does its civilization suggest?The Sumerian civilisation was the earliest urban culture in the area, emerging in southern Mesopotamia approximately 4000 BCE, or 6000 years ago.
Due to its numerous inventions and achievements, such as the first schools, the early version of the story of the great flood, and other biblical tales, etc., Sumer is known as the "Sumerian civilization." Sumer was the southernmost part of ancient Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq and Kuwait).
The name means "country of the cultured kings" and is derived from Akkadian, a language spoken in northern Mesopotamia.
Learn more about Mesopotamian, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26116131
#SPJ2
Suppose that you lived in the north during the early 1800s. right a letter to a cousin in Europe telling about the changes in transport and daily life that were taking place at that time.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Dear Cousin,
Compliment of the season over to you there. I hope you receive this letter in good health. How are Dad and Mum? I miss you all.
I am very excited to write this letter to inform you about the latest development happening in the northern part of the United States of America.
In this early period of the 1800s, we have witnessed so many industrial developments, slavery has been abolished as well, and about eighty percent of the industry is in the north compared to the south.
Oh?! My beloved cuz, it would be interesting for you to know that a lot has changed in terms of transportation too. We now have National Road, Steamboat that is much faster, new canals have been built to ease water transportation, and most significantly there is the development of railroads. This railroad's transportation is cheaper and faster, in fact, I can now travel down south without worrying too much about the expenses.
I hope you can come someday to experience it yourself, so I will not be adding any picture for you to see. Try and come by Christmas.
I love you cuz.
Kind regards to everybody.
Brainstorm a list of the reasons the colonists rebelled against England and another list of the reasons the
South rebelled against the Union. Compare and contrast the two 'revolutions'.
Once you've compared and contrasted the reasons and actions of the two, write a 250-word essay
explaining how they are different or similar.
Answer:
Reasons for Colonists against England:
1. High Tariff Taxes.
2. Disputed Claims on the Continent.
3. Social Engineering Gone Wrong.
4. Religious Tensions and Resentment of Canada.
Reasons for South against Union:
1. Centralization v.s. States Rights.
2. Slavery.
3. Cultural Differences.
4. Religion.
Explanation:
There are many alikes and differences between the two revolutions. The most common cause was "tension" between the two sides that fought for contrasting yet similar reasons. Colonists were trying to escape the rules from England, such as the South trying to pry itself from the North's laws. All the goals that the colonists were trying to acheive were for all their representation, not discluding any peers. The South however were using their objectives to intentionally continue the crimes and free labor against african americans, not for their own freedom.
describe why Native American slavery did not last long
Answer:
Tribal territories and the slave trade ranged over present-day borders. Some Native American tribes held war captives as slaves prior to and during European colonization. Some Native Americans were captured and sold by others into slavery to Europeans, while others were captured and sold by Europeans themselves. In the late 18th and 19th centuries, a small number of tribes adopted the practice of holding slaves as chattel property, holding increasing numbers of African-American slaves.
European influence greatly changed slavery used by Native Americans, as pre-contact forms of slavery were generally distinct from the form of chattel slavery developed by Europeans in North America during the colonial period. As they raided other tribes to capture slaves for sales to Europeans, they fell into destructive wars among themselves, and against Europeans.
Read the excerpt and answer the question below. "Into this land of meek outcasts there came some Spaniards who immediately behaved like ravening wild beasts . . . killing, terrorizing, afflicting, torturing, and destroying the native peoples, doing all this with the strangest and most varied new methods of cruelty, never seen or heard of before, and to such a degree that this Island of Hispaniola once so populous (having a population that I estimated to be more than three million), has now a population of barely two hundred persons.”-Source: Bartolomé de Las Casas, Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies, 1542. Which of the following historical figures most likely would agree with de Las Casas’s account of Spanish colonization? * A.Hernan Cortes B.Christopher Columbus C.Francisco Pizarro D.Moctezuma II
Answer: D. Moctezuma II
Explanation: “Moctezuma was the leader of the Aztec City Tenochtitlan when the Spanish invaded. He would have agreed that the Spaniards “bahaved like revening wild beast” and caused the deaths of indigenous people.”
On the basis of the given excerpt, Moctezuma II would most likely to agree with de Las Casas’s account of Spanish colonization. Thus, the correct option is D). Moctezuma II.
Who was Moctezuma II?
Moctezuma II was one of the last Aztec emperors. He was born in 1466, inTenochtitlan. Moctezuma II was the ninth Aztec emperor of Mexico, who became very famous for his dramatic confrontation with the Spanish conquistador.
During his emperor, the Aztec empire had its peak, conquered the other tribes and expanded their territories. He was a very popular ruler who expanded his empire and took it to its peak. He led a wealthy lifestyle away from the life of the people and due to which many tribes rebelled against him.
Basically, he gave all his power to Spanish and allowed it to conquer them due to his religious superstition.
Learn more about Moctezuma II here:-
https://brainly.com/question/25938709
#SPJ2
What views did Europeans hold about land and expansion?
Answer:
Europeans viewed land and expansion being a sign of power. The more land you had, the more powerful you were.
Explanation:
How did the role of women change between the Paleolithic Era and Neolithic Era?
Answer:
During the Paleolithic Era women had generally served different roles to men, but were considered equal members of society. The transition to the Neolithic Era, however, reduced the status of women.
To what country does the United States primarily owe its political heritage?
______________
What are the 5 steps of a feedback loop?
Answer:
1) Get Everyone Involved in the Process Early On.
2) Focus on More Than Just the Data.
3) Analyze the Data to Make It Actionable.
4) Discuss Results with Employees.
5) Create Opportunities For Employees to Take Action.
Explanation:
just did a quick google search aint gonna lie to you
Explanation:
♤ GET EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS EARLY ON .
♤ FOCUS ON MORE THAN JUST THE DATA .
♤ ANALYZE THE DATA TO MAKE IT ACTIONABLE.
♤ DISCUSS RESULTS WITH EMPLOYEES
♤ CREATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYEES TO TAKE ACTION.
HOPE IT HELP.....❤❤What happens in a society that does not have the rule of law?
Answer: What would happen if there were no rules and regulations in our society? ... If all rules and regulations were repealed today, the nation by definition would descend into anarchy. Mass looting, criminality, and violence would consume communities since there would be no legal recourse for addressing injustices and disputes. if there was no rule of law government officials would take advantage of their positions. it was added because its job was to protect people from a strong central government by listing the rights of citizens.
what are four areas of potential conflict over territory between European countries?
Answer:
Four areas of potential conflict:
Fishing rights in the North Sea between the Nordic Nations and the British Isles. In fact, a conflict has already emerged, in the 1980s, between the United Kingdom and Iceland.Russian expansionism in Eastern Europe. There is actually an ongoin conflict related to this factor, in Eastern Ukraine.European dependency on Russia for enegry sources. Most of Europe gets its gas natural from Russia, because other than Russia, the rest of European countries are largely devoid of this important natural resource.Internal separatist movements. There are several separatist movements in Europe: Catalonia in Spain, Scotland in the United Kingdom, Veneto in Italy, A dozen in the Caucasus, all being potential sources of conflict.Which principle established during the enlightenment does this excerpt reflect?
Answer:
The screen shot shows the correct answer! It is B. The government should protect the rights of its citizens.
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps!!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!
help me please and thank u i need alot of help
What was the purpose of the Great Compromise?
A. Create three branches of government- legislative, executive, and judicial
B. Settle a land dispute
C. Decide how the president would be elected D. Settle the way states and citizens were represented in the national government
Answer: It was to solve the discussion between small and large states.
Explanation: The compromise offered by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth.
The legislative body that resulted from the signing of the Magna Carta served what purpose? A. It acted as a system of checks and balances. B. It removed the monarch from the legislative process. C. It held the monarch accountable to the people. D. It ensured that the voice of the people was heard.
Answer:
A. It acted as a system of checks and balances.
Explanation:
egd
The correct option is A. The legislative body that resulted from the signing of the Magna Carta served as a system of checks and balances.
King John endorsed a document called the Magna Carta in 1215. This declaration said that people could not be deprived of their lives, liberties, or possessions unless determined to be unlawful by another's law and made kings subject to the law.
What was the impact of the signing of the Magna Carta?Magna Carta, which was adopted in the middle of June 1215, successfully stopped the start of major hostilities. A week after it was created, the King wrote to every county in England, ordering his sheriffs to declare a strong truce and make plans for the charter's enforcement.
The Magna Carta, which was published in June 1215, was the first document to express the idea that the king and his government were subject to the law. By creating law as a power unto itself, it tried to restrain the king from abusing his position of authority and set boundaries for royal power.
Thus, The answer that best reflects reality is option A, as the legislative body created as a result of the Magna Carta's signing operated as a system of checks and balances.
Learn more about The Magna Carta here:
https://brainly.com/question/549211
#SPJ2
Explain why the national government was weaker than individual states under the Article of
Confederation.
I
Answer:
The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts. States had also fallen into debt and were raising taxes to pay off those debts.
I hope this helps u!
Explanation:
A developing country rebuilding its roads might turn to which UN organization for help?
Answer:
The world bank
Explanation:
What happened in 1722 that finally gave the Ottomans political stability throughout their empire?
Answer:
Language
Download PDF
Watch
Edit
The Ottoman–Hotaki War of 1722–1727 were a series of conflicts fought between the Ottoman Empire and the Afghan Hotaki dynasty, over control of all western and northwestern parts of Iran.
Ottoman–Hotaki War of 1722
Answer:
The Ottoman–Hotaki War of 1722–1727 were a series of conflicts fought between the Ottoman Empire and the Afghan Hotaki dynasty, over control of all western and northwestern parts of Iran.
Explanation:
The Hotakis were an Afghan tribe and dynasty that ruled over parts of nowadays Afghanistan and Iran from 1722 to 1729, after having taken advantage of the heavily declining and plagued by civil strife and royal intrigues Safavid Dynasty of Persia. The Safavid, once the arch enemy and most powerful opponent of the Ottomans, had been severely declining since the late 17th century due to incompetent rulers and civil strife. The Hotaki dynasty was founded in 1709 by Ghilzai Pashtuns of Kandahar who led a successful revolution against their Safavid suzerains.
(During the decline of the Safavid state, the Ottoman Empire (the rivals of the Safavids), and Russian empires, had taken advantage of Iran's decadence to annex de facto a large number of frontier districts. Folling the Afghan invasion, the Russians under Peter I immediately launched the Russo-Persian War (1722–1723), capturing and securing Iran's northwestern territories for themselves, comprising parts of Dagestan, Azerbaijan and Baku, as well as several territories in contemporary northern mainland Iran, such as Gilan and Astrabad. The Ottomans invaded from the Safavids their neighbouring west, capturing swaths of Iran's western territories. By the Treaty of Constantinople (1724), Russia and the Ottomans agreed to divide the captured regions from Iran.)