help meee plssssssssss

Answer:

a and b

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

interquartile range = 5

.

The mean absolute deviation = 3.6

.

hope this gonna help !

Answer:

range = 15

IQR= 5

mean absolute deviation  = 3.6

1st quartile = 10

median= 12.5

3rd quartile = 15

Answer:

24.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer

Step-by-step explanation:

1,00,75,302= One crore seventy five thousand three hundred two

Rearranging the digits,

Largest number = 7,53,21,000

Smallest number = 1,00,02,357

Answer:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{3x^2+4.5}{x^2-1.5}=3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to evaluate the limit:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{3x^2+4.5}{x^2-1.5}[/tex]

To do so, we can divide everything by x². So:

[tex]=\displaystyle \lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{3+4.5/x^2}{1-1.5/x^2}[/tex]

Now, we can apply direct substitution:

[tex]\Rightarrow \displaystyle \frac{3+4.5/(\infty)^2}{1-1.5/(\infty)^2}[/tex]

Any constant value over infinity tends towards 0. Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle =\frac{3+0}{1+0}=\frac{3}{1}=3[/tex]

Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{3x^2+4.5}{x^2-1.5}=3[/tex]

Alternatively, we can simply consider the biggest term of the numerator and the denominator. The term with the strongest influence in the numerator is 3x², and in the denominator it is x². So:

[tex]\displaystyle \Rightarrow \lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{3x^2}{x^2}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]\displaystyle =\lim_{x\to\infty}3=3[/tex]

The limit of a constant is simply the constant.

We acquire the same answer.

Answer:

b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.

Step-by-step explanation:

Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The reflexive property of congruence

Step-by-step explanation:

This property says that an object is congruent to itself.

Answer: ABC = 2145

Step-by-step explanation:

11x13x15=2145

Answer:

whatever wawnser gimme brainliest

Answer: Angle VUW and QRP are alternate exterior angles.

They are both exterior and are on alternate sides of the transversal.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

77.43% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

A decrease of 11% = (100 - 11)% = 89% = [tex]\frac{89}{100}[/tex] = 0.89

A decrease of 13% = (100 - 13)% = 87% = [tex]\frac{87}{100}[/tex] = 0.87

A 11% decrease followed by a 13% decrease has an overall change of

0.89 × 0.87 = 0.7743 × 100% = 77.43%

The midpoint of the tallest bar of the histogram is the mode of the data point.

Graph is a graphical representation that shows the relationship between a group of points. Types of graphs are histogram, bar chart, pie chart etc.

A histogram is a graphical representation that arranges a group of data points into specific ranges.

The midpoint of the tallest bar of the histogram is the mode of the data point.

Find out more on histogram at: https://brainly.com/question/2962546

#SPJ2

Answer:

The equation would be y = -3/2x - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is -3/2 and the y-intercept is -1.

Answer:

x = -2

y = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

7y - 5x = 45    -------------------(I)

x = 8 - 2y -----------------------(II)

Substitute x = 8 - 2y in equation (II)

7y - 5(8-2y) = 45

7y + 8 *(-5) - 2y*(-5) = 45

7y - 40 + 10y = 45

17y - 40 = 45

17y = 45 + 40

17y = 85

y = 85/17

y = 5

Plugin y = 5 in equation (II)

x = 8 - 2*5

x = 8 - 10

x = -2

Ani do niot know lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

J. 20ft

Step-by-step explanation:

1 2/3 = 5/3

5/3 * 12/1 = 60/3

60/3 = 20

Answer:

the number of child plates and adults plates were served is 125 and 155 respectively

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us assume the child plate be x

And, the adult plates be y

Now according to the question

x + y = 280 .................(1)

2.60x + 9.50y = 1797.50 .............(2)

Now multiply by 2.60x in equation (1)

2.60x + 2.60y = 728

2.60x + 9.50y = 1797.50

-6.90y = -1069.50

y = 155

So, x = 280 - 155

= 125

hence, the number of child plates and adults plates were served is 125 and 155 respectively

Answer:

The area of the fenced yard is 48 feet sq. and the perimeter is 32 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps! Have a great rest of your day!

Answer:

7/3

Step-by-step explanation:

1x6

1x(-x)

subtract and solve

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

4x+6=8x-10

6= 8x-10-4x

6=4x-10

6+10=4x

16=4x

16/4=x

4=x

x=4

Answer:

x = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 8x from both sides.

4x + 6 - 8x = 8x - 10 - 8x

−4x + 6 = −10

Subtract 6 from both sides.

−4x + 6 − 6 = −10 − 6

−4x = −16

Divide both sides by -4.

[tex]\frac{-4x}{-4} = \frac{-16}{-4}[/tex]

x = 4

Mark as Brainllest plz

Answer:

Slope: -69

Y-intercept: -346 or (0, -346)

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b

    m = slope

    b = y-intercept

y = -69x - 346

    m = -69

    b = -346

Answer:

r = 7.1 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following data;

Volume of hemisphere = 757 cm³

To find the radius of the hemisphere;

Mathematically, the volume of a hemisphere is given by the formula;

Volume of hemisphere = ⅔πr³

Where, r is the radius of the hemisphere.

π = 22/7

Substituting into the formula, we have;

757 = ⅔πr³

Cross-multiplying, we have;

757 * 3 = 2πr³

2271 = 2*22/7*r³

2271 = 44/7*r³

Cross-multiplying, we have;

2271 * 7 = 44r³

15897 = 44r³

r³ = 15897/44

r³ = 361.30

Taking the cube root of both sides, we have;

r = 7.1223

To the nearest tenth of a centimeter;

r = 7.1 cm

Answer:

Ebony can type faster at 58.6 words per 2 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2 x 4 = 2

No problem :) remember to give me brainliest :0

Answer:

2 miles per day

Step-by-step explanation:

First make sure they both have a common denominator.

1/2=2/4miles per 1/4 of a day

You multiply both by 4.

This gives you a ratio of 2:1

2 miles per day

Answer:

The answer is 12 times

Step-by-step explanation:

6 x 12 = 72

112 - 72 = 40

40/5 = 8

12 + 8 = 20 times

so the answer is 12 ;)

Answer:

48 questions

Step-by-step explanation:

60 into 80 by 100

60 x 80/100

simplify, hence 60 x 4/5

240 divided by 5 = 48

: )

The number of questions Mia get right is 48 questions.

A percentage is a number or ratio that can be expressed as a fraction of 100. Percentage can be calculated by dividing the value by the total value, and then multiplying the result by 100.

For the given situation,

Total number of questions = 60

Percentage of questions Mia got completed right = 80% = 0.80

Thus number of questions Mia get right = [tex](60)(0.80)[/tex]

⇒ [tex]48[/tex]

Hence we can conclude that the number of questions Mia get right is 48 questions.

Learn more about percentages here

brainly.com/question/1214133

#SPJ2

Answer:

>> Null hypothesis; H0: μ1 - μ2 ≥ 0

Null hypothesis; Ha: μ1 - μ2 < 0

>> z = 1.85

>> p-value = 0.03

>> there is evidence sufficient to reject the claim that average weekly food expenditure of households in City 1 is more than that of households in City 2.

The economist claim is not supported by data.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Sample mean of city 1; x1¯ = 164

Sample mean of city 2; x2¯ = 159

Sample size of city 1; n1 = 35

Sample size of city 2; n2 = 30

Standard deviation of city 1; σ1 = 12.5

Standard deviation of city 2; σ2 = 9.25

Let's define the hypotheses;

Null hypothesis; H0: μ1 - μ2 ≥ 0

Null hypothesis; Ha: μ1 - μ2 < 0

Test statistic which is the z-score Formula between 2 mean is;

z = ((x1¯ - x2¯) - 0)/√((σ1)²/n1) + ((σ2)²/n2))

z = (164 - 159 - 0)/√((12.5²/35) + (9.25²/30))

z = 5/2.705

z = 1.85

From online p-value from z-score calculator attached, using z = 1.85, one tailed, significance value of 0.05, we have;

p-value = 0.03

The p-value is less than the significance value, and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence sufficient to reject the claim that average weekly food expenditure of households in City 1 is more than that of households in City 2.