How was the Nazi soviet Pact surprising ?

England was attacked many times in the early middle ages by warriors from Scandinavia called Vikings.

Vikings are those Scandinavians, especially from Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, who from the late 8th to the early 11th century voyaged and raided Europe, extending as far as Greenland, Iceland, and America.

These ancient Norse seafarers were also traders, explorers, and settlers who, according to tradition, founded various lands, including the kingdom of Normandy, Russia, Iceland, and Greenland.

They were known for their longships, which allowed them to navigate quickly and easily across the oceans and rivers and made them a formidable force in warfare.

Vikings were also skilled in building, crafts, metalworking, and farming, and their influence can be seen in many aspects of medieval culture in Europe.

Learn more about Vikings: brainly.com/question/449407

#SPJ11

Answer:

D

Explanation:

B is the answer.

Explanation:

Itadori Supremacy

Answer:

American Civil War

Explanation:

Secession, in U.S. history, the withdrawal of 11 slave states (states in which slaveholding was legal) from the Union during 1860–61 following the election of Abraham Lincoln as president. Secession precipitated the American Civil War

pls mark as brainliest!! and hope this helped you

Answer: The lend-lease act

Explanation: It was the correct answer on the test

Franklin Delano Roosevelt used the quote to justify the policies of Lend and Lease Act. Thus, the correct option is D.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an American politician and lawyer who served as the President of the United States from 1933 to 1945.

The Lend-Lease Act was a program under which the United States began supplying the United Kingdom with food, oil, and military equipment.

During World War II, the United States was able to provide military help to its overseas supporters while staying nominally impartial in the war due to this policy.

Therefore, the correct answer is D, the Lend-Lease Act.

Learn more about Lend-Lease Act, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1126649

#SPJ2

Answer:

A) shuttle diplomacy

Explanation:

To negotiate a cease-fire between Israel and the Arab countries, Secretary of State Kissinger used shuttle diplomacy. Therefore, option A is correct.

Shuttle diplomacy is the act of an outsider mediating between the disputing parties without having direct contact between the parties themselves in diplomacy and international affairs.

Traditionally and typically, the process requires the intermediary to travel back and forth between one principal's working place and another ("shutting").

Especially when nations are involved, negotiations are conducted through a middleman who moves back and forth between the parties.

Shuttle diplomacy is sending diplomats between nations whose leaders refuse to communicate directly with one another to mediate their disputes.

Learn more about shuttle diplomacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/9960226

#SPJ7

Answer:

D. Rebel slave states

Explanation:

The words "designated States" and "parts of states" refer to the Rebel Slave states.

Thus the correct answer is option D.

To learn more about Emancipation Proclamation, refer: https://brainly.com/question/880731

#SPJ2

Answer: The Silk Road was and is a network of trade routes connecting the East and West, and was central to the economic, cultural, political, and religious interactions between these regions from the 2nd century BCE to the 18th century.[1][2][3] The Silk Road primarily refers to the land but also sea routes connecting East Asia and Southeast Asia with South Asia, Persia, the Arabian Peninsula, East Africa and Southern Europe.

Please give me brainlest!

Answer:

THE SILK ROAD:

The Silk Road is the concept of a chain of roads and other means of passage from Xi'an in China to the Mediterranean Sea. Basically a way opened up for trade via land routes. It was 7000 miles long.

It got its name in 1859.

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PRICE?

For the goods which were traded using the Silk road, as they traveled along their prices increased at each city, i.e. situated  along the route to its destination. This was so because as new transporters would pick up the goods and next it would be moved further from their original destination.

This increased the overall price of the goods.

Explanation:

During Napoleon's time, the French people were willing to surrender their liberties for security. They were prepared to do so since the freedoms that they had been granted were continuously being infringed upon.

People were ready to give up their freedom of speech since the government controlled the press, making it a criminal offense to print or distribute "false news." Freedom of assembly and association was similarly restricted, and those caught participating in secret societies, such as the Masons, were punished.

The French people were willing to trade off their freedom of the press and their freedom of assembly, given the results that Napoleon's leadership had brought.Finally, the French were willing to surrender their liberty of thought. They were satisfied with Napoleon's belief in the primacy of the state over the individual. As long as he was in charge, the country would continue to prosper, and the people were content with this arrangement.

To know more about security visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32133916

#SPJ11

Answer:

what year for this question?

Answer:

c

Explanation:

It let slaves free that were under union control. So mainly the North had zero slaves after the Emancipation Proclamation. Hope this helps

Answer:

ffyrtyuet

Explanation:

Answer: ...

Explanation:

Answer:

Seventy years after the end of World War II, it is still celebrated as the good war, a necessary war for democracy to counter the threat of fascism. ... In reality, the “Allies”—governments who the then American President Roosevelt called the “four policemen”—cared little about democracy.

So yes i think they did promote democracy, so hope this helps

Explanation:

Answer:

Germany, Austria-Hungary and their allies, including Bulgaria. Great Britain, France and Russia who were known as 'The Triple Entente'.

Explanation:

Hope this helped.

Answer:

Ming

Explanation:

Answer: The action or fact of accepting or yielding to a superior force or to the will or authority of another person. 'they were forced into submission' 'First, Hurston describes a gap in the relationship as Joe attempts to force Janie's submission to his authority.

Answer: world history WH

Explanation:

Answer:

it should be the United Nations

Answer:

Explanation:

Talk about how the ToV (Treaty of Versailles) humiliated Germany as a whole.

Talk about the hyperinflation caused by the printing of money because they had to pay a large amount of reparation  (part of the ToV).

Talk about how the country spent 1/3 of its income on war pensions to pay the widows and families who have lost their loved ones in the war.

Overall, Germany was on the brink of collapse.

Answer:

Where are the following?

Explanation:

Be more specific

Americans following the American Revolution aggressively denounced any traces of hierarchical or monarchical privilege associated with aristocratic power systems, which had traditionally been enforced in English society with titles of nobility.

As a result of the strong anti-monarchical sentiments inspired by the Revolutionary War, the newly established American nation sought to completely eradicate the concept of noble birth determining one’s societal status, rights, or expectations. American founders rejected the notion that any person would be granted special privilege or power simply because of their noble birthright.

This sentiment was encapsulated in the Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, which barred any individual with title of nobility from the federal government, and eventually spread to the state governments – many of which legislated laws prohibiting any type of formal aristocracy. As such, throughout the late 18th and early 19th centuries, emergent American society consistently denounced any insistence on the power or privilege of noble birth.

To know more about American Revolution, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/9053584

#SPJ4

Answer: true because Restoration, Restoration of the monarchy in England in 1660. It marked the return of Charles II as king (1660–85) following the period of Oliver Cromwell's Commonwealth. The bishops were restored to Parliament, which established a strict Anglican orthodoxy.

Answer:

The main objective of foreign policy is to use diplomacy — or talking, meeting, and making agreements — to solve international problems. They try to keep problems from developing into conflicts that require military settlements. The President almost always has the primary responsibility for shaping foreign policy.

Explanation:

Answer:

A Burial At Ornans

f i r e s i d e c h a t s

Answer:

forsest fires and dust storms

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not include a reference to any text, excerpt, article, or book, to know who Doña Marina is, we can comment on the following.

According to our knowledge on this topic, we can say that this woman was better known as the "Malinche," the woman of the conqueror Hernan Cortés, who helped the Spaniards as a translator and interpreter.

The story of Doña Marina is representative of the collapse of Mesoamerican and South American societies in that "La Malinche" was a Mesoamerican woman from Veracruz, México. She was one of the slaves the Aztecas gave to Cortés as a tribute or a "welcome gift." La Malinche betrayed the Mesoamerican Indian people and worked for Cortés in exchange for protection and a better living.

This betrayal has been studied by historians and they conclude that some Native Mesoamerican tribes betrayed other Indians such as teh Aztecs because the Aztecs were a warrior empire that conquered many tribes and forced the Indians to be slaves and pay tribute.

So when the Spanish conquerors arrived, these tribes saw an opportunity for retribution against the Aztecas, That is why they betrayed them That was the case of the Indian tribes such as the Tlaxcalans and Cholullans.

Explanation:

Within the span of a few decades from the late 19th to the early 20th century, the United States was transformed from a predominately rural agrarian society to an industrial economy centered in large metropolitan cities. Prior to the American industrial revolution, most Americans were reared in largely isolated agricultural households and small towns that were linked to the external world by horse drawn wagons (Olmstead and Rhode 2000: 711). Except for towns that were connected to railroads or water borne shipping, isolation and the costs of overland transportation meant that many rural communities were largely self sufficient in food, clothing, and many other essentials of everyday life. This changed dramatically in the early decades of the 20th century, as the supply and lowered costs of manufactured goods created a consumer revolution for both urban and rural households. Many of these goods, which did not even exist a few decades earlier, were manufactured, marketed, and transported through a rapidly expanding national network of rail lines and highways. By 1920, one half of northern farms had automobiles and telephones (Olmstead and Rhode 2000: 712–713).

Theses changes were the direct result of the American industrial revolution that was founded on rising investment, employment, and productivity in the manufacturing sector. In 1880, when the agricultural frontier had largely disappeared, almost one-half of the American workers were still farmers and only one in seven workers (less than 15%) worked in manufacturing of any sort. The industrial sector, as late as 1870, consisted primarily of small firms and workshops that relied on artisan technology to produce tools, furniture, building materials, and other goods for local markets (Abramovitz and David 2000: 45). Many small industries, such as grain mills and sawmills, were often located in rural areas close to flowing rivers in order to power machinery. Following the technological revolutions of the early industrial age, workshops and small foundries were supplemented by large factories engaged in mass production. The development of commercial electricity at the end of the 19th century allowed industries to take advantage of the labor supply in large cities. The scale of change is illustrated by thdure not only tmregeGolureustrialization in the United States, but were also the age of urbanization and immigration. The 1880s were the first decade in American history, with the exception of the Civil War decade, when the urban population increased more than the rural population (in absolute numbers).rural to urban migration of the native born picked up during this era, but domestic urbanward migrants were dwarfed by the flood of immigrants coming to cities. From 1880 to 1920, the number of foreign born increased from almost 7 million to a little uhere a causal impact? Addressing this question, the objective of this analysis, requires consideration of the counterfactual of what would have been the course of the industrialization process in the United States if there had not been an immigrant workforce.

The most commonly cited reasons for the rapid American industrial revolution are the abundance of mineral resources, technological innovation, the evolution of the American system of manufacturing, railroads and lowered costs of transportation, education and human resources, and the rise of the managerial firm (Abramovitz and David 2000; Chandler 1977; Denison 1974; Hounshell 1984; Wright 1990). Among the studies that address the relationship between immigration and industrialization, few go beyond a general or abstract discussion. In a classic survey of the literature on the American industrial revolution in the Cambridge Economic History of the United States, the role of immigration is summarized in a single paragraph, which simply notes the overrepresentation of immigrants in the manufacturing labor force (Engerman and Sokoloff 2000: 387). There are some studies that conclude that the flood of immigration in the late 19th and early 20th centuries had an adverse impact on the per-capita economic growth, the wages of native workers, and diverted domestic migration away from industrializing cities (Hatton and Williamson 1998: Chapter 8; Goldin 1994). However, other researchers have questioned these conclusions and suggested that immigrants had a generally positive impact on the American economy and facilitated the economic mobility of native born workers during the age of industrialization (Carter and Sutch 1999; Haines 2000: 202; Muller 1993: 83–85; Thomas 1973: 174).follow me

Explanation:

The 1800 United States presidential election was the fourth quadrennial presidential election. It was held from October 31 to December 3, 1800. In what is sometimes referred to as the "Revolution of 1800", Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party defeated incumbent President John Adams of the Federalist Party. The election was a political realignment that ushered in a generation of Democratic-Republican leadership