Answer:
Yeah, but I would switch china to the Coalition. Remember, the USSR was part of the Allies, and we aren't ~technically~ enemies with China. At least not yet.
Explanation:
Why the grand council set up the commons house of assembly?
Answer:
They had the power only to ratify or reject the statutes proposed by the Grand Council. Over the next half-century the assemblymen, seeking to make the lower house a mirror image of the English House of Commons, usurped enormous political power from the royal governor and council.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Write the names of the Northern states that made up each of these regions.
The six New England states
The three Mid-Atlantic states
The seven Midwest states
Answer:
The six New England states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
The three Mid-Atlantic states: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania.
The seven Midwest states: Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky.
HELPPPPPPPP
What is one way that the rule of law has influenced the development of the American legal system?
A. All people, including politicians and other leaders, must enact fair laws.
B. Defendants are guilty until proven innocent.
C. Penalties for violating civil laws are more severe than for violating criminal laws.
D. Elected officials must obey constitutional laws but not statutory laws.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The answer is A because everybody has to follow the federal laws and also the laws of the state that they are in so with that being said people that are into politics run for a position in either the federal law position or a state law position they would have to make fair laws that effect everybody the same. Also it has to pass the guide lines of the federal/state regulations for passing a law.
3. Which of the following religions have a significant number of adherents
in Europe, Africa, and the Americas?
a. Christianity
b. Islam
C. Judaism
d. Buddhism
e. Hinduism
Answer:
Christianity
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1850 resolved the issue of slavery in Utah and New Mexico through
Answer:
The Compromise of 1850 resolved the issue of slavery in Utah and New Mexico through popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
I really do need help with this... no files or links... plz i will mark you brainly and give you a heart...
Answer:
No clue
Explanation:
Why did the founders of America desire a Limited Government?
Answer:
The idea for limited government is enshrined in the US Constitution, because when being written, the founding fathers were concerned at the possibility of tyrannical government. ... This ambiguous clause, can allow Congress to legislate in areas that are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
Explanation:
s
What right does the 5th Amendment give to US citizens? susdad A Tho nght to own a brearm The noht to refuse to be a witness against themselves, C. The night of freedom of speech, no matter the circumstance
Answer:
B
Explanation:
help quick pleeeeaaassseee
What problems did the Trans-saharan trade face?
Answer:
Smuggling and Terrorism
Explanation:
How would steamboats help the economy of the new America?
•MADE IT EXPENSIVE
•CAUSED TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS
•DIVIDED THE NATION
•OPENED UP WORLD TRADE
causes transportation problem
Explain how Germany caused France to surrender.
Answer:
when Paris fell the German conquest of France was reaching its end, Marshal Henri Petain made Paul Reynaud new prime minister, he announces his intention to sign an armistice with the Nazis. Only one day after, French General Charles de Gaulle made a broadcast to France from England, urging his countrymen to continue the fight against Germany.
hope that helps
according to the archaeological practice of stratigraphy objects that are oldest
a) are found in easter Africa
b)are found deepest in the earth
c)will be found near major rivers
d)contain the greatest amount of carbon
In a well-developed essay, explain whether the benefits of projects to dam rivers in the Columbia Basin have outweighed their cost. Provide evidence to support your claim.
Write a clear claim that responds to the prompt.
!!!!WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!!!!
Answer:
I need help too! Im stuck on this one and i am a day over due!!!
Explanation: AHHHHHH
Answer:
Sample Response: The benefits of dams built for the Columbia Basin Project far outweigh any costs. They generate hydroelectric power and provide water for the area’s farms, which is important to the state’s economy.
Explanation:
just switch some of the words and they won't notice :)
What were the three key territorial gains in the unification of Italy
Answer:
The unification of Italy
Explanation:
The Unification of Italy was the mastermind of Giuseppe Garibaldi, Victor Emmanuel II, and Camillo Benso di Cavour. The unification aimed to join all the city-states as one to form a nation. In 1859, the kingdom of Sardinia- Piedmont defeated the Austrians in the north and advanced towards the South to unite the nation. Lombardy-Venetia, Milan, and Rome were the major territorial gain for Italy.
What is the Islamic Golden Age and why is it called that?
Answer:
Explanation:
Baghdad was centrally located between Europe and Asia and was an important area for trade and exchanges of ideas. Scholars living in Baghdad translated Greek texts and made scientific discoveries—which is why this era, from the seventh to thirteenth centuries CE, is named the Golden Age of Islam.
Answer/Explanation:
Baghdad was centrally located between Europe and Asia and was an important area for trade and exchanges of ideas. Scholars living in Baghdad translated Greek texts and made scientific discoveries which is why this era, from the seventh to thirteenth centuries CE, is named the Golden Age of Islam.
help pls for brainsliti
In the case of slavery, do the ends justify the means?
Answer:
It depends on how it ended in the end
How is China persecuting the Uighers?
Answer:
"Re-education" camps which are essentially concentration camps.
what are two reasons to why the prohibition of alcohol in the 20th century failed?
Refer to the article "Making Money" in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text. Which statement best describes the overall structure of "Making Money"?
Answer:
The text describes what causes damage to paper money and coins, then explains the step-by-step process for producing each type of currency.
Explanation:
The text explains what is causing the damage to paper money and coins, and then explains the step-by-step process of producing each type of coin or money.
What is the overall structure of making money?The procedure for making paper money and coins is described in detail and in sequence from start in the article written in the money magazine.
The document describes how money laundering problems are solved during various monetization processes.
Hence, to make money the author has given step by step process through which any person can make money.
To learn more about Making Money, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/25607827
Are Austria- Hungary and Great Britain friends or enemies?
How do you all feel about the way the trial of
George Floyd has turned out so far and why?
Answer:
The fact that the that particular policeman hasnt been punished yet is outrageous. NOTICE: I don't think that the entire police force should be defunded. The country would break out in chaos if that happened!
Explanation:
pls give brainliest? D:
What were the changes made in voting rights in the 1820s?
G
Using context clues, which phrase best defines the
word millet?
Read the passage carefully.
The Yellow River is often called the "cradle of Chinese
civilization." It was along the banks of the Yellow River
where the Chinese civilization first formed. The Yellow
River is 3,395 miles long, making it the sixth longest river
in the world. It is also called the Huang He River.
Early Chinese farmers built small villages along the
Yellow River. The rich yellow-colored soil was good for
growing a grain called millet. The farmers of this area
also raised sheep and cattle.
- "Ancient China: Geography,"
Ken Nelson
O a type of soil
O a small village
O a type of food
O a river bank
So
Answer:
Clearly it refers to a type of food.
Explanation:
Well, I looked it up and that's what it means.
!!!!help asap brainliest reward!!!!!
Tracy was recently arrested for disorderly conduct and robbery. She was ranting at commuters about the government spying on people through cell phone cameras. She grabbed several phones from people’s hands and tossed them into traffic to be destroyed. Should she be prosecuted for these crimes? What punishment or intervention would you recommend, and why?
Answer:
She should be prosecuted
Explanation:
In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;
The defendant did so willfully; and.
The defendant acted with malice.
I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
The defendant acted maliciously and with intent to harm.
What punishment or intervention would you recommend, and why?The Commonwealth must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant harmed or destroyed another person's home, building, or personal property in order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property. The defendant acted maliciously and with intent to harm.
Since she is a first-time offender, my personal preference is that she be penalized for being required to perform community service. This would only be feasible if she underwent a mental health evaluation to ensure that her mental health is in good standing.
She could have been experiencing mental stress, which is why she was acting erratically. If this were the case, she should be sent to a mental hospital where she would get treatment before facing any more punishment.
Learn more about criminal law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ2
A contested presidential election
The Compromise of 1877 resolved the tumult that had arisen following the 1876 presidential election. In that election, Democratic candidate Samuel J. Tilden of New York won 247,448 more popular votes than Republican Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio. But the electoral votes in the three southern states of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina were disputed. For almost four months, from November into late February, tensions remained high as the question of who was to become the nation’s next president remained unresolved. Rutherford B. Hayes won the contested election of 1876 as a result of the Compromise of 1877. Image courtesy Library of Congress.
In January 1877, Congress established a 15-member Electoral Commission to resolve the issue of which candidate had won the contested states. The commission voted 8-7 along party lines to award the votes of all three states to Hayes. As the commission deliberated, members of Congress and others made their own efforts to end the crisis, but no written, formal agreements resulted. The presidency in return for home rule in the South. During Reconstruction, the period after the Civil War when the South reorganized its political, social, and economic systems to account for the end of slavery, federal troops occupied the South. These troops served to guarantee African American men's right to vote, and the Republican-controlled federal government would only end the military occupation when states rewrote their Constitutions to recognize the citizenship and voting rights of African American men. White Southerners generally despised these troops, and wanted an end to the intervention of the federal government in the South. The Compromise of 1877 gave white Southerners their chance to stop the military occupation of the South. In the compromise, Southern Democrats agreed not to block the vote by which Congress awarded the contested electoral votes to Rutherford B. Hayes, and Hayes therefore became president. In return, Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from actively intervening in the politics of Louisiana and South Carolina (the last two states occupied by federal troops). Accordingly, within two months of becoming president, Hayes ordered federal troops in Louisiana and South Carolina to return to their bases. Cartoon showing a Southern veteran and a Northern veteran (missing a leg) shaking hands over a tombstone that reads "In Memory of Union Heroes in a Useless War." In the background, an African American family kneels in chains. This Thomas Nast cartoon, published in 1864, suggested that compromising with the South was tantamount to betraying the Union dead. Image courtesy Library of Congress. The removal of the federal soldiers from the streets and from statehouse offices signaled the end of the Republican Party’s commitment to protecting the civil and political rights of African Americans, and marked a major political turning point in American history: it ended Reconstruction. Another important part of the Compromise of 1877 was that Republicans agreed to home-rule in the South. Home-rule meant that the Republican Party would refrain from interfering in the South’s local affairs, and that white Democrats, many of them racist, would rule. Southern Democrats, for their part, pledged that they would “recognize the civil and political equality of blacks.” They did not subsequently carry through on this promise but instead disfranchised black men from voting and imposed Jim Crow segregation across the South. In all, with the Compromise of 1877, the Republican Party abandoned the last remnant of its support for equal rights for African Americans in the South. With the withdrawal of federal troops went any hope of reconstructing the South as a racially-egalitarian society after the end of slavery. As Henry Adams, a black Louisianan, lamented, “The whole South—every state in the South—had got into the hands of the very men that held us as slaves.” In the aftermath of the Compromise of 1877, a few African Americans in some areas of the South continued to vote and serve in government offices into the 1890s, but the Compromise of 1877 marked the effective end of the Republican Party’s active support of civil rights for black Americans. Southern states rapidly passed laws disenfranchising African Americans and implementing racial segregation.
1. What did the Compromise of 1877 mean for African Americans?
2. Did the white Southern Democrats who promised that they would recognize civil and political rights for African Americans as part of the Compromise of 1877 hold true to this promise?
3. Why do you think the Republican Party gave up on supporting civil rights for African Americans in this era?
PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE ON SUNDAY AT 11:59PM
Write 4-6 sentences and use the Answer-Cite-Explain format to answer the
following question:
Evaluate the extent to which the Haitian Revolution marked a change in World
History
Answer:
By changing politics and damage to trans-Atlantic slave trade.
Explanation:
The Haitian Revolution marked a great change in World History because it changed the geopolitics of empire in the Americas, threatened to damage the trans-Atlantic slave trade and plantation economy. The social instability of Saint Domingue was the main cause of the Haitian revolution. The French Revolution helps in giving rights to slaves, and therefore causing anger and hatred between these different social classes of people led to this revolution.
Can someone pls help me with this question!
Why did Nellie Bly at first think of her assignment as a "hopeless one"?
A. She did not have any confidence in her acting skills.
B. She did not think she could fool doctors.
C. She was afraid of the insane people
Answer:
B. She did not think she could fool doctors.
Explanation: <
no links pls, best answer gets brainliest
How do you think the media affected the Till case? How would things have been different had there not been magazine, newspaper, and television coverage of the funeral and trial?
Why do you think Till's murder was such an important event in the Civil Rights Movement?
Answer: The brutality of his muder and the fact that his killers were acquitted drew attention to the long history of violent persecution of African Americans in the United States. Till posthumously became an icon of the civil rights movement.
The media had a significant impact on how the public perceived the Emmett Till case. The murder of Emmett Till drew widespread attention in newspapers, magazines, and on television, highlighting the brutality of racism in the United States.
Who was Emmett Till?Emmett Till was a 14-year-old African-American boy who was brutally murdered in August 1955 in Money, Mississippi.0
Till was on his way home from Chicago when he allegedly whistled at a white woman named Carolyn Bryant in a grocery store.
The media coverage helped to spread Till's story, which fueled the civil rights movement.
It is possible that if the funeral and trial were not covered by the media, Till's story would have gone unnoticed outside of his immediate community.
It is also possible that the murderers would not have been brought to justice if the media had not been involved.
Thus, Till's murder, as well as the subsequent trial and acquittal of his assailants, galvanized support for the civil rights movement and aided in the passage of civil rights legislation in the years that followed.
For more details regarding Emmett Till, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26990858
#SPJ2
Which of there represents a primary difference between a market economy and a command economy?
A) Both have minimal government regulation, but command economies promote competition to meet demands of the consumers.
B) Both are largely regulated by the government, but command economies promote competition to meet demands of the consumers.
C) Market economies are largely regulated by government, and there is little private ownership, while command economies do not have such regulation and allow for more private ownership.
D) Command economies are largely regulated by government, and there is little private ownership of property, while market economies have far fewer regulations and allow for more private property ownership.