The correct statement is : W is a subspace of M2x2.
TO show that W is a subspace of M2x2, we need to verify that it satisfies the three properties of a subspace:
1. W contains the zero matrix:
The zero matrix in M2x2 is the 2x2 matrix with all entries equal to zero, which is not in W . However , we can see that the matrix {0,0;0,0} can be obtained as the difference between two matrices in W: {9,0;0,0} -{0,ber;0,0} = {0,0;0,0}. So , W does contain the zero matrix.
2. W is closed under addition:
Let A and B be two matrices in W. Then, A ={9,0;0,0} + {0,ber;0,0} and B = {9,0;0,0} + {0,ber;0,0}, which is also in W. Therefore, W is closed under addition.
3. W is closed under scalar multiplication:
Let A be a matrix in W and c be a scalar. Then ,A = {9,0;0,0} + {0,ber;0,0}, and c A = c {9,0;0,0} + c{0,ber;0,0}.
Since {9,0;0,0} and {0,ber;0,0} are both scalar multiples of A, c {9,0;0,0} and c{0,ber;0,0} are also in W . Therefore , W is closed under scalar multiplication.
Since W satisfies all three properties of a subspace, we can conclude that W is a subspace of M2x2.
Learn more about Subspace : https://brainly.com/question/31140613
#SPJ11
9.20. set s = 2z = {2x : x ∈ z}, the set of even integers. prove that s is equicardinal with z.
To prove that the set S = 2Z = {2x : x ∈ Z}, the set of even integers, is equicardinal with Z, the set of all integers, we need to show that there exists a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) between the two sets.
A one-to-one correspondence between two sets exists if every element of one set is paired with a unique element from the other set, and vice versa.
Let's define a function f: Z -> S such that f(x) = 2x for every x ∈ Z.
This function assigns each integer x from Z to its corresponding even integer 2x in S.
To prove that f is a bijection, we need to show that it is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto).
Injectivity: Suppose f(a) = f(b) for some a, b ∈ Z. Then, 2a = 2b. Dividing both sides by 2, we get a = b. Hence, f is injective.
Surjectivity: For every y ∈ S, y = 2x for some x ∈ Z. Choosing x = y/2, we have f(x) = 2x = y. Therefore, f is surjective.
Since f is both injective and surjective, it is a bijection. Thus, S and Z are equicardinal sets.
To learn more about equicardinal click on,
https://brainly.com/question/31423223
#SPJ4
Two discrete random variables have a joint PMF as described in the following table. PM (m, n) m = 1 2 m = 3 n=1 1/5 7/45 1/9 n = 2 8/45 4/45 2/45 n = 3 2/15 1/15 1/45 (a) Find the marginal PDFs, P(m) and Py(n). Р (b) Find Pr(N=1|M= 2). (c) Find Pr(MEN). (d) Find Pr(M>N).
a. P(1) = 0.3556, P(2) = 0.3111, P(3) = 0.0444; Py(1) = 0.5333, Py(2) = 0.4444, Py(3) = 0.1222 b. P(N = 1 | M = 2) ≈ 0.2574 c.P(M = 2, N = 3) ≈ 0.038 d. Pr(M>N) = 0.5333.
a. The marginal probability function of m is given by P(m) = Σn P(m, n) and that of n is given by P(n) = Σm P(m, n).
Thus, the marginal PDFs are: P(1) = 1/5 + 8/45 + 2/15 = 0.3556 P(2) = 7/45 + 4/45 + 1/15 = 0.3111
P(3) = 1/9 + 2/45 + 1/45 = 0.0444 P(1) + P(2) + P(3) = 1 Py(1) = 1/5 + 7/45 + 2/15 = 0.5333
Py(2) = 8/45 + 4/45 + 1/15 = 0.4444 Py(3) = 2/15 + 1/15 + 1/45 = 0.1222 Py(1) + Py(2) + Py(3) = 1.
b. We need to find P(N = 1 | M = 2).
From the joint probability distribution table, we can see that P(N = 1, M = 2) = 8/45. P(M = 2) = 0.3111.
Using the conditional probability formula, P(N = 1 | M = 2) = P(N = 1, M = 2)/P(M = 2) = 8/45 ÷ 0.3111 ≈ 0.2574
c. We need to find the probability that M = E and N = N.
Since the two random variables are independent, we can simply multiply their probabilities: P(M = E, N = N) = P(M = E) × P(N = N).
The probability distribution of M is given by: M=1 with probability 0.3556 M=2 with probability 0.3111 M=3 with probability 0.0444
The probability distribution of N is given by: N=1 with probability 0.5333 N=2 with probability 0.4444 N=3 with probability 0.1222
Therefore, P(M = 2, N = 3) = P(M = 2) × P(N = 3) = 0.3111 × 0.1222 ≈ 0.038
d. We need to find P(M > N).
There are three possible pairs of values for (M, N) such that M > N: (M = 2, N = 1), (M = 3, N = 1), and (M = 3, N = 2).
The probabilities of these pairs of values are: P(M = 2, N = 1) = 1/5 P(M = 3, N = 1) = 1/9 P(M = 3, N = 2) = 1/15
Therefore, P(M > N) = P(M = 2, N = 1) + P(M = 3, N = 1) + P(M = 3, N = 2) = 1/5 + 1/9 + 1/15 = 0.5333.
Answer: a. P(1) = 0.3556, P(2) = 0.3111, P(3) = 0.0444; Py(1) = 0.5333, Py(2) = 0.4444, Py(3) = 0.1222 b. 0.2574 c. 0.038 d. 0.5333
Know more about marginal probability here,
https://brainly.com/question/30075742
#SPJ11
please help, tysm if you do
Answer: It’s 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hoped I help :)
The person who answers has an explanation that doesn't have a link, and isn't incorrect gets brainiest. Ok here is the question "What are the first 30 characters in pi aka ~3.141592653589793238462643383 is all I remember."
Answer:
3.14152628283829299348473929
M is the midpoint of PQ. PM = 7x + 8 and MQ = 5x+ 20. Find the value of x.
A part manufactured at a factory is known to be 12.05 cm long on average, with a standard deviation of 0.119. One day you suspect that that the part is coming out a little longer than usual, but with the same deviation. You sample 19 at random and find an average length of 12.25. What is the z-score which would be used to test the hypothesis that the part is coming out longer than usual?
Z-score is used to test the hypothesis that the part is coming out longer than usual. Z-score is defined as the number of standard deviations away from the mean.
It is calculated using the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, and σ is the population standard deviation. In the given problem, the population mean is μ = 12.05 cm and the population standard deviation is σ = 0.119 cm. The sample mean is x = 12.25 cm. The sample size is n = 19.
Therefore, the formula to calculate the z-score is Z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n) Substituting the values, we get z = (12.25 - 12.05) / (0.119 / √19) ≈ 6.586Therefore, the z-score which would be used to test the hypothesis that the part is coming out longer than usual is approximately 6.586.
To know more about standard deviation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
One of the legs of a right triangle measures 12 cm and the other leg measures 13 cm find the measure of the hypotenuse if necessary round the nearest 10th
Answer:
17.7 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
One of the legs of a right triangle measures 12 cm and the other leg measures 13 cm find the measure of the hypotenuse if necessary round the nearest 10th
To find the Hypotenuse of a right angle triangle, we solve using Pythagoras Theorem
Hypotenuse ² = Opposite ² + Adjacent ²
Hypotenuse = √Opposite ² + Adjacent ²
Opposite = 12 cm
Adjacent = 13 cm
Hence,
Hypotenuse = √12² + 13²
= √144 + 169
= 17.691806013 cm
Approximately = 17.7 cm
Therefore, the measure of the Hypotenuse is 17.7 cm
Suppose Lucy want to make sure that when she reaches into her drawer, she is certain to take out enough gloves so that she will have one matching pair to wear. HOW MANY GLOVES MUST SHE TAKE?
Answer:
its 2
Step-by-step explanation:
I have consulted many nice people ( my idiot friends) they all say 2 good luck
A snow removal service in Minnesota is deciding to purchase a new snow removal machine. If they dont purchase the machine, they will make $20,000 if the winter is mild, 530,000 il it is typical, and $50,000 the winter is severe. If they purchase the machine, their profits for these conditions will be $30,000, 535,000 and $40,000, respectively. The probability of a mild winter is 0.3. a typical winter is 0.5 and a severe winter is 0.2. What is the EMV for no machine? 32000 34500 35000 31000
The Europay, Mastercard and Visa (EMV) for not purchase the snow removal machine is $31,000.
The expected monetary value (EMV) for not purchasing the snow removal machine is $31,000. This value is calculated by multiplying the probabilities of each winter condition by the corresponding profits and summing them up. The probabilities for a mild winter, typical winter, and severe winter are 0.3, 0.5, and 0.2, respectively.
The profits for each condition without the machine are $20,000, $530,000, and $50,000. By multiplying each profit by its probability and adding them together, we get the EMV of $31,000 for not purchase the machine.
In detail, the EMV is calculated as follows:
EMV = (Probability of Mild Winter * Profit for Mild Winter) + (Probability of Typical Winter * Profit for Typical Winter) + (Probability of Severe Winter * Profit for Severe Winter)
EMV = (0.3 * $20,000) + (0.5 * $530,000) + (0.2 * $50,000)
EMV = $6,000 + $265,000 + $10,000
EMV = $31,000
Therefore, the EMV for not purchasing the snow removal machine is $31,000.
Learn more about Probability: https://brainly.com/question/25839839
#SPJ11
Find the derivative of f(x) = 8x + 4 at x = 9. (6 points)
Answer:
f(x) = 76
Step-by-step explanation:
All you do is plug-in for x: (x = 9)
f(x) = 8x + 4
f(x) = 8(9) + 4
f(x) = 72 + 4
f(x) = 76
Han and Andre were comparing the miles they ran during one week of cross country practice Hantan 12 which was three times as much as Andre
How many they run together during the one week
Answer:
I don't know.
Step-by-step explanation:
The perimeter of a rectangular field is 298 yards. If the width of the field is 63 yards, what is its length?
Answer:
The length is 86 yards.
Step-by-step explanation:
63 is the width so,
63 + 63 = 126
Now subtract this from the total perimeter,
298 - 126 = 172
and divide by 2 because there are sides with the same length
172/2 = 86
The length is 86.
what equation represents this sentence?
0.7 increased by a number is 3.8.
a. 3.8 n = 0.7
b. 3.8 + n, = 0.7
c. 3.8n = 0.7
d. 0.7 + n = 3.8
The equation that represents the sentence "0.7 increased by a number is 3.8" is d) 0.7 + n = 3.8
To understand why this equation is the correct representation, let's break it down. The phrase "a number" can be represented by the variable n, which stands for an unknown value. The phrase "0.7 increased by" implies addition, and the number 0.7 is being added to the variable n. The result of this addition should be equal to 3.8, as stated in the sentence.
Therefore, we have the equation 0.7 + n = 3.8, which indicates that when we add 0.7 to the unknown number represented by n, we obtain a value of 3.8. This equation accurately captures the relationship described in the sentence, making option d, 0.7 + n = 3.8, the correct choice.
To know more about equation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29657992
#SPJ11
People were polled on how many books they read the previous year. Initial survey results indicate that s = 13.6 books Complete parts (a) through (d) below. Click the icon to view a partial table of critical values. (n) How many subjects are needed to estimate the mean number of books read the previous year within six books with 90% confidence? This 90% confidence level requires subjects. (Round up to the nearest subject.)
Approximately 48 subjects are needed to estimate the mean number of books read the previous year within six books with 90% confidence.
To estimate the mean number of books read the previous year within a certain margin of error, we need to determine the sample size required. In this case, we want to estimate the mean with a 90% confidence level and a margin of error of ±6 books.
The formula to calculate the required sample size is given by:
n = (Z * σ / E)²Where:n = sample sizeZ = z-value (corresponding to the desired confidence level)σ = standard deviation (unknown in this case)E = margin of errorSince the standard deviation is unknown, we can use the initial survey result, s = 13.6 books, as an estimate for σ. However, this may result in a larger sample size than necessary.
Referring to the critical values table, we find the z-value corresponding to a 90% confidence level is approximately 1.645. Plugging in the values into the formula:
n = (1.645 * 13.6 / 6)²n ≈ 47.57Since the sample size must be a whole number, we round up to the nearest subject. Therefore, approximately 48 subjects are needed to estimate the mean number of books read the previous year within six books with 90% confidence.
Learn more about sample size
brainly.com/question/30174741
#SPJ11
3. Which property justifies rewriting
2r-7x
*(2-7) ?
OA. Associative property of multiplication
OB. Distributive property
OC. Commutative property of multiplication
O D. Associative property of addition
Today i will walk 3 miles per hour to school, which is 1.5 miles away how many hours would this trip take
Answer: 30 minutes so 1/2 hour
Step-by-step explanation:
Because 3 miles = 1 hour
1.5 times 2 = 3
divide 2 on both sides
Answer:
2 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
divide3 by 1.5 and that is how long it will take you
Using the part-whole meaning of a fraction, find the larger of each. Write down your explanation. 12 10 d. and and f. and 101 19
we can conclude that 12/17 is the larger fraction between 12/17 and 12/19 using the part-whole meaning of a fraction.
To determine which fraction is larger between 12/17 and 12/19 using the part-whole meaning of a fraction, we need to compare the sizes of the parts (numerators) relative to the wholes (denominators) for both fractions.
Let's consider the fractions 12/17 and 12/19:
For 12/17:
- The numerator, 12, represents a part of the whole.
- The denominator, 17, represents the total number of equal parts into which the whole is divided.
For 12/19:
- The numerator, 12, also represents a part of the whole.
- The denominator, 19, represents the total number of equal parts into which the whole is divided.
Since the numerators are the same (both 12) and we are comparing the fractions with the same numerator, the fraction with the smaller denominator represents larger parts or more significant portions of the whole.
Comparing the denominators, we can see that 17 is smaller than 19. This means that the whole in 12/19 is divided into fewer parts compared to the whole in 12/17. Therefore, each part of the whole in 12/17 is larger than each part in 12/19.
As a result, we can conclude that 12/17 is the larger fraction between 12/17 and 12/19 using the part-whole meaning of a fraction.
Learn more about Fraction here
https://brainly.com/question/30335970
#SPJ4
The points (x, 3) and (-1, -4) lie on the same line. If the slope of the line is 1, what is
the value of x?
A-3
B 1
C 6
D-6
Answer:
C) 6
Step-by-step explanation:
use slope formula:
(-4 - 3) / (-1 - x) = 1
cross-multiply:
-7 = -1 - x
-6 = -x
6 = x
A trapezoid has bases of lengths 38 and 52. Find the trapezoids area if it’s height is 8.
Answer:
360
Step-by-step explanation:
Using Matlab, include the code, a brief discussion of the
code/logic, graphs and screenshots with results, and a brief
analysis/discussion of the results.
4. Repeat exercise 3 using the Secant method. Repeat iterations until the approximate error becomes less than 0.1%. (20%] a. Which method is better? Secant or False-position?
The correct answer is The logic behind the Secant method is to iteratively update two initial guesses, x0 and x1, based on the function evaluations at those points. The formula x2 = x1 - (f(x1) * (x1 - x0)) / (f(x1) - f(x0)) is used to update the guesses and obtain a new approximation, x2
Here's an example MATLAB code that implements the Secant method to find the root of a function:
% Function to find the root of
function y = myFunction(x)
[tex]y = x^3 - 5*x^2 + 6*x - 2;[/tex]
end
% Secant method
x0 = 0; % Initial guess x0
x1 = 1; % Initial guess x1
approx_error = 1; % Initial approximation error
while approx_error > 0.001 % Set the desired approximation error threshold
[tex]x2 = x1 - (myFunction(x1) * (x1 - x0)) / (myFunction(x1) - myFunction(x0));[/tex]
[tex]approx_error = abs((x2 - x1) / x2) * 100; % Calculate the approximation[/tex]error
x0 = x1;
x1 = x2;
The logic behind the Secant method is to iteratively update two initial guesses, x0 and x1, based on the function evaluations at those points. The formula x2 = x1 - (f(x1) * (x1 - x0)) / (f(x1) - f(x0)) is used to update the guesses and obtain a new approximation, x2. The iteration continues until the approximation error, calculated as the absolute difference between x2 and x1 divided by x2, falls below the desired threshold (in this case, 0.001).
To compare the Secant method with the False-position method, you can apply both methods to the same function and compare their convergence and accuracy. You can also analyze the number of iterations required for each method to achieve a certain level of approximation error.
Please note that in order to generate graphs and screenshots with results, it would be best to run the code in a MATLAB environment and visualize the results directly.
Learn more about statistics here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765147
#SPJ11
Evaluate 3f(2) what is it
Answer:
the eanswer should be 12
Step-by-step explanation:
i took the test
Complete the Square of the quadratic equation in standard form: ax2 + bx + c Treat this like a literal equation where you are solving for x by completing the square. To get started, write the equation in the form: x2 + bx = ?
Answer:
x = [-b ±√(b² - 4ac)]/2a
Step-by-step explanation:
ax² + bx + c = 0
dividing through by a, we have
ax²/a + bx/a + c/a = 0
x² + bx/a + c/a = 0
x² + bx/a = -c/a
we now add th square of half the coefficient of x to both sides, thus
x² + bx/a + (b/2a)² = -c/a + (b/2a)²
simplifying the left hand side and right hand side, we have
(x + b/2a)² = -c/a + b²/4a²
re-arranging, we have
(x + b/2a)² = b²/4a² - c/a
taking L.C.M of the right hand side, we have
(x + b/2a)² = (b² - 4ac)/4a²
taking square-root of both sides, we have
√(x + b/2a)² = ±√[(b² - 4ac)/4a²]
x + b/2a = ±√(b² - 4ac)/2a
So, x = -b/2a ±√(b² - 4ac)/2a
taking the L.C.M of the right hand side, we have
x = [-b ±√(b² - 4ac)]/2a
A rectangle has a length of 2x + 1 and a width
of 5x - 4. Which expression best describes the
area of the rectangle?
F 7x - 3
H 10x2 – 3x - 4
J 10x2 + 13x - 4
G 14x - 6
Answer:
H
Step-by-step explanation:
The rectangle has a length of (2x + 1) and a width of (5x - 4).
And we want to select the expression that represents the rectangle's area.
Recall that a rectangle's area is simply its length multiplied by its width. Thus:
[tex]A=(2x+1)(5x-4)[/tex]
Expand by distributing:
[tex]A=(2x+1)(5x)+(2x+1)(-4)[/tex]
Distribute:
[tex]A=(10x^2+5x)+(-8x-4)[/tex]
Simplify:
[tex]A=10x^2-3x-4[/tex]
Hence, our answer is H.
Janna is buying a netbook with a flash drive. The total cost c will include the price p of the netbook plus $12.50 for the flashdrive. Which is the dependent variable?
What function is shown in the graph?
A)
y=-3X
B)
B
y = 3-X
0
y = 3x + 2
D)
y = 3* + 2
Answer:
5x
Step-by-step explanation:
got it right on edg
6th grade math help me pleaseeee
Answer:
Meryann brought 6 friends to the party
Step-by-step explanation:
y=9x+24
24 is your constant because the cost for all the pizza won't change
9x will change, so x represents the number of friends she brought
and y will be 78 because it's the total amount of money
78=9x+24
all you have to do is solve this equation
54=9x
x=6
Answer:
Meryann had 6 friends at the party.
Step-by-step explanation:
Total cost = $78
Pizza cost = $24
1 Movie Ticket = $9
Movie Tickets = Total Cost - Pizza Cost
Movie Tickets = $78 - $24 = $54
No. of Friends = Movie Tickets ÷ Movie Ticket
No. of Friends = $54 ÷ $9 = 6
No. of Friends = 6
Mhanifa please help im almost done :)
Answer:
19)
9/4 = (r - 10)/r9r = 4(r - 10)9r = 4r - 405r = -40r = -820)
(x + 6)/x = 10/710x = 7(x + 6)10x = 7x + 423x = 42x = 1421)
(n - 9)/(n + 5) = 7/47(n + 5) = 4(n - 9)7n + 35 = 4n - 363n = -71n = -71/322)
6/(b + 9) = 4/(b + 5)6(b + 5) = 4(b + 9)6b + 30 = 4b + 362b = 6b = 323)
8/3 = (v - 9)/(7v + 4)8(7v + 4) = 3(v - 9)56v + 32 = 3v - 2753v = - 59v = -59/5324)
8/(5x - 4) = 6/(x + 5)8(x + 5) = 6(5x - 4)8x + 40 = 30x - 2422x = 64x = 64/22x = 32/11You measure a wound to be 2.5 inches long. How many millimetres long is the wound? Round to the nearest tenth.
You measure the depth of a wound to be 0.25 inches. How many millimetres is this? Round to the nearest whole number.
(a) If you measure a wound to be 2.5 inches long, the corresponding length in millimeters is 63.5 mm.
(b) If you measure the depth of a wound to be 0.25 inches, the corresponding length in millimeters is 6.35 mm.
What is the measure of the lengths?If you measure a wound to be 2.5 inches long, the corresponding length in millimeters is calculated as follows;
1 in = 25.4 mm
2.5 in = ?
? = 2.5 x 25.4 mm
? = 63.5 mm
If you measure the depth of a wound to be 0.25 inches, the corresponding length in millimeters is calculated as follows;
1 in = 25.4 mm
0.25 in = ?
? = 0.25 x 25.4 mm
? = 6.35 mm
Learn more about length measurement here: https://brainly.com/question/30275824
#SPJ4
An analyst Is forecasting net Income for Excellence Corporation for the next fiscal year. Her low-end estimate of net Income is $261,000, and her high-end estimate is $312,000. Prior research allows her to assume that net income follows a continuous uniform distribution. The probability that net income will be greater than or equal to $299,500 Is Multiple Choice 75.5% O o 24.5% 84.4% O O 41.6%
A net income forecast for Excellence Corporation is made by an analyst for the next fiscal year. Low-end estimate of net income is $261,000High-end estimate is $312,000. Net income follows a continuous uniform distribution. To find: The probability that net income will be greater than or equal to $299,500. In order to solve the problem, we need to calculate the probability that net income will be between $299,500 and $312,000.
Then, we will subtract it from the probability that net income will be between $261,000 and $312,000. This difference will give us the required probability. P(261000 <= X <= 312000) = (312000-261000) / (312000-261000) = 0.2P(299500 <= X <= 312000) = (312000-299500) / (312000-261000) = 0.55P(X >= 299500) = P(299500 <= X <= 312000) - P(261000 <= X <= 312000) = 0.55 - 0.2= 0.35 or 35%.
Thus, the probability that net income will be greater than or equal to $299,500 is 35%. Therefore, the answer is: 24.5%.
Know more about probability:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
For the following regression model Y = α + βX + u
-Explain how we can test if we adopt the wrong functional forms
of independent variables?
In order to test if we have adopted the wrong functional forms of independent variables in a regression model Y = α + βX + u, we can use diagnostic plots of the residuals.
Residuals are the differences between the actual values of the dependent variable and the predicted values of the dependent variable. We can plot the residuals against the independent variables to check if there is any functional form that has not been captured by the model, which would indicate that the model has adopted the wrong functional form of independent variables.
If there is no pattern in the residuals when plotted against the independent variables, then it can be concluded that the model has captured the correct functional form of the independent variables. However, if there is a pattern in the residuals, it would indicate that there is some functional form that has not been captured by the model, and we would need to explore different functional forms of the independent variables to see which one fits the data better. This can be done by using different functional forms of the independent variables, such as polynomial, logarithmic, exponential, etc., and comparing the results using various statistical tests.
To know more about regression model, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31969332
#SPJ11
If the residuals are normally distributed, then it suggests that the functional form of the independent variable is correct. If they are not, then it suggests that the functional form of the independent variable is incorrect.Overall, it is important to test for the functional forms of independent variables to ensure that the results of the regression model are unbiased and accurate.
In a regression model, it is important to make sure that the functional forms of the independent variables are correct. If they are not, the results of the model may be biased and incorrect. There are several ways to test if the functional forms are correct or not. Below are some of the methods:Plotting the residuals against the independent variable: If the functional form of the independent variable is correct, then the residuals should be randomly distributed around zero, without showing any patterns. If there are patterns in the residuals, then it suggests that the functional form is incorrect. Testing for linearity: One way to test for linearity is by including the square or cubic terms of the independent variable in the model and testing their significance. If the squared or cubic term is significant, then it suggests that the functional form of the independent variable is incorrect. Testing for additivity: One way to test for additivity is by including interaction terms between the independent variables and testing their significance. If the interaction term is significant, then it suggests that the functional form of the independent variable is incorrect. Testing for normality: One way to test for normality is by examining the normal probability plot of the residuals.
To know more about normally distributed, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11